In The News: NYT focuses on food sanitation, serious food-borne diseases
With the recent recalls of millions of gallons of ice cream as well as several tons of hummus, pine nuts, frozen vegetables and various meat products, you might think the American food supply is an unholy mess. It's not. It's arguably the safest in the world, according to a news analysis by The New York Times' Kate Murphy earlier this month.
Yet despite continually improving processing methods and quality controls, the number of cases of food-borne illness has remained stubbornly high since the 1990s, with the incidence of people getting sick from some pathogens increasing. Some experts wonder if we've reached a point of diminishing returns in food safety, whether our food could perhaps be too clean.
Industrial food sanitation practices, along with home cooks' antibacterial veggie washes, chlorine bleach kitchen cleaners and sterilization cycle dishwashers, kill off so-called good bacteria naturally found in foods that bolster our health. Moreover, eliminating bad or pathogenic bacteria means we may not be exposed to the small doses that could inoculate us against intestinal crises.
The theory that there might be such a thing as "too clean" food stems from the hygiene hypothesis, which has been gaining traction over the last decade. It holds that our modern germaphobic ways may be making us sick by harming our microbiome, which comprises all the microscopic beasties - bacteria, viruses, fungi, mites, etc. - that live in and on our bodies.
Research so far has focused primarily on the detrimental effects of cesarean births and not breast-feeding, which may inhibit the formation of a robust microbiome, and the use of antibacterial soaps and antibiotics, which diminish the microbiome once it is established.
A result is an immune system that essentially gets bored, spoiling for a fight and apt to react to harmless substances and even attack the body's own tissues. This could explain the increasing incidence of allergies and autoimmune disorders such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease.
There is also the suggestion that a diminished microbiome disrupts hormones that regulate hunger, which can cause obesity and metabolic disorders. When it comes to food-borne illness, the idea is that fewer good bacteria in your gut means there is less competition to prevent colonization of the bad microbes, leading to more frequent and severe bouts of illness.
Moreover, your underutilized immune system may lose its ability to discriminate between friend and foe, so it may marshal its defenses inappropriately (e.g., against gluten and lactose) or not at all. All of this is hard to prove. While there has been some research to support the effectiveness of consuming harmless bacteria, known as probiotics, in reducing the likelihood of gastrointestinal infection, there are ethical issues involved in dosing humans with known dangerous pathogens like salmonella and listeria.
But animal experiments have lent some credence to the theory. Researchers at Texas Tech University in Lubbock have found that guinea pigs fed less virulent strains of listeria are less likely to get sick or die when later fed a more pathogenic strain. And anyone who has visited a country with less than rigorous sanitation knows the locals don't get sick from foods that can cause tourists days of toilet-bound torment.
"We have these tantalizing bits of evidence that to my mind provide pretty good support for the hygiene hypothesis, in terms of food-borne illness," said Guy Loneragan, an epidemiologist and professor of food safety and public health at Texas Tech's Department of Animal and Food Sciences.
This is not to say we'd be better off if chicken producers eased up on the salmonella inspections, we ate recalled ice cream sandwiches and didn't rinse our produce. But it raises questions about whether it might be advisable to eradicate microbes more selectively.
Written by Kate Murphy
CONTACT: Michael Orth, chairman, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University at (806) 742-2805 or michael.orth@ttu.edu
0520NM15 /Editor's Note: For full text of The New York Times article, please go to http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/10/sunday-review/invite-some-germs-to-dinner.html?_r=1
Departmental News
- Agricultural & Applied Economics
- Agricultural Education & Communications
- Animal & Food Sciences
- Landscape Architecture
- Natural Resources Management
- Plant & Soil Science
- Veterinary Science
Press Room
Editor: Norman Martin
Maps: Where to Find It
Davis College NewsCenter
-
Address
P.O. Box 42123, Lubbock, Texas 79409-2123, Dean's Office Location:Goddard Building, Room 108 -
Phone
(806)742-2808 -
Email
kris.allen@ttu.edu